In re Marriage of Eberhardt, No. 1-07-0135 & 1-07-2142, Cons. (December 12, 2008) 6th div. (Cahill) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.
Trial court correctly concluded that there is no bar to treating distributions from IRA accounts, distributed to husband as property in dissolution of marriage proceeding, as income for purposes of child support; and trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied father's petition to modify his child support obligation. Further, trial court did not err when it denied husband's claim that personal funds held in bank accounts garnished by former wife are exempt. However, trial court erred when it awarded former wife's petition for attorney's fees without affording former husband evidentiary hearing which he requested.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Can i put your content on my blog ...?
regards
Interest blog, I try to keep up with US divorce law and see how it compares to UK law.
What about In re Marriago of O'Daniel, 382 Ill. App. 3d 845, 889 N.E.2d 254; (2008)?
Thanks a lot!
your blog is very informative.
Keep it always updated.
Cobleys Child Custody Solicitors Family Law team deal with all matters relating to Children Law.
Post a Comment